Institutional
Faculty Dashboard
Cohort analytics, per-student scoring, and competency mapping.
Students
20
Teams
4
Scenarios
3
Avg Leadership
76
Communication
79
AI Usage
84
Student Leadership DNA
Behavioral fingerprint per student
A. ParkDecisive Visionary
M. ChenAnalytical Operator
J. OkaforRelational Closer
R. SinghSystems Builder
L. ItoIndependent Creator
Behavior Assessment
Initiative82
Collaboration78
Risk-taking64
Listening71
Recovery from failure69
Leadership Growth Tracking
Round 1+4 pts
Round 2+7 pts
Round 3+3 pts
Round 4 (proj.)+5 pts
Round 5 (proj.)+6 pts
Team Comparison
Collingwood vs class leader Frontenac
Competency Heatmap
Learning outcomes
Strategic Thinking78
Product Leadership82
Financial Literacy61
Market Adaptation80
Team Collaboration74
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty70
Team Ranking
| Team | Profitability | Product | Leadership | Health | Rank | Projected Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collingwood | $-24,680 | 82 | 78 | Moderate | 3 | 70 |
| Alfred | $14,200 | 74 | 76 | Strong | 2 | 90 |
| Bader | $-8,400 | 60 | 62 | Weak | 4 | 50 |
| Frontenac | $38,500 | 88 | 86 | Strong | 1 | 100 |
Role Performance
AI Faculty Summary
Assessment
Team Collingwood demonstrates strong product ambition but weak operational discipline. Their leadership learning opportunity is resource prioritisation and financial control.Student Analytics
Team Collingwood
| Student | Role | Role Score | Participation | Decision | Collab | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Park | CEO | 81 | 92 | 78 | 86 | 78 |
| M. Chen | CFO | 64 | 88 | 60 | 80 | 68 |
| J. Okafor | CM | 72 | 90 | 70 | 82 | 74 |
| R. Singh | DPM | 84 | 94 | 82 | 88 | 84 |
| L. Ito | Developer | 70 | 86 | 72 | 76 | 72 |